What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
Animal experiments in general and in purpose (for cosmetics) are discussed in the video.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
The purpose of the speaker is to inform about animal experiments and persuade readers not to use animals as experimental material.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
a. How trustworthy is this video?
I think the video can be trusted because the video is taken from an NMC source that works on animal rights and in the video there is a note about the speaker’s interview with scientists.
b. Who is the speaker?
The speaker is April Mendoza. She is a YouTuber with 200 subscribers. I don’t know her background of her because on his YouTube account she only uploaded one video.
c. What is the source?
The source is from NMV Youtube Channel titled “ the failure of animal testing”
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzXXHUnQTjg
d. Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think the source can be trusted because it is from an organization working for animal rights. I don’t really trust the speaker because there is no specific background from her.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
The speaker seemed to disagree with animal testing. In the last 1 minute, the speaker presented interview data with chemists such as Stephanie Schenz and Gabriela Miranda. In the last video, it was explained that she was trying to persuade listeners to voice about animal rights and stop supporting activities related to animal testing
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
The speaker explained about the video which contains general information about animal testing then she inserted an interview with a chemist with questions such as the question What is in the mind of a chemist when he experiments with enzymes with animals and whether all animals can be used as experimental material in an experiment and for the last one she persuades to stop animal testing.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Title : “The Body Shop Forever Against Animal Testing”
Ganatra, V., Sinha, R., Srishti, S., Pandey, R., Kadam, P., Ristiansyah, S. A., Sin, L. G., Yin, C. L., Kee, D. M. H., Jin, L. Y., Wei, O. Y., & Wei, L. P. (2021). The Body Shop “Forever Against Animal Testing”. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 6(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v6i1.1082
How the article contributes to the project :
This article tells about a beauty company that is against animal testing. The similarity between this article and the video in this project is both of them discuss animal testing in cosmetics. But in the video, it is explained that there are many products that use animal testing while in this article the emphasis is on an object which is against animal testing.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The thing discussed in the video is how the baby chickens live on a chicken farm.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
There are two purposes of the speaker
First she gives information about the lifeline of chickens while on the farm. The second he persuades in green water he persuades people to stop being cruel to animals and choose food that does not contain meat in it
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
3. How trustworthy is this video?
This video can be trusted because it was uploaded on the official animal equality account on YouTube.
Who is the speaker?
Animal Equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.
What is the source?
By investigating in the chicken farm.
Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
Yes, the source by investigating and the speaker is Animal Equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
The speaker does not agree with the existence of animal life on farms because based on investigations animals living on farms are very tortured and treated cruelly.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
Based on the investigations he has carried out, he concludes at the end of the video that living chickens on farms is very unethical she also persuades us that we as listeners and readers can reduce the consumption of chicken meat or replace meat-free.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Title : Chickens: The Cruelty of Chicken Farms
https://thehumaneleague.org/article/factory-farmed-chickens
How the article contributes to the project :
Both articles and videos explain in detail the sad situation when chickens are bred in factory farms. The video explains the stages of the chickens on the farm but in the article, the details are explained about how the chickens are bred, some countries with chicken farms the highest level, and how the chickens are raised on farms. Both of these sources persuade readers to support the existence of chicken farms in factories that are not good for chickens.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video is about the cruelty to bulls that are included in a cultural festival in Spain. These bulls are released while running where it locks the bulls in the middle of the city. They are afraid and stressed, they sprain and even hurt themselves. After that, the bulls do not get treatment and they are herded to the field to be shown to the public and injured by people bt=y throwing stones and even being shot in the head to death.
On the other place in Guadalajara, there is an event of people who are not supportive about this festival being attacked by the natives because the natives have normalized this festival. On this occasion, there are children who saw the extreme cruelty of animals. Animal Equality sneaked and documented this event.
In Novia das, there was a young bull that was not more than 3 years old being stabbed by the matador. The matador not only kills a young bull but he also kills and stabs a calf that is less than 2 years old with repeated stabbings in the neck. The speaker also mentions that we must fight animal cruelty and visit their website to sign the petition.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
The main purpose of the speaker is to provide information about the bullfighting festival in Spain and persuade readers not to support the festival because it can harm the bull.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
How trustworthy is this video?
This video can be trusted because it presents a real investigation provided by Animal Equality.
Who is the speaker?
The speaker is a member of the Animal Equality community.
What is the source?
The source comes from real investigations about bullfight in Spain.
Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think speakers who are from the animal equality community and sources from real investigations are something that can be trusted.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
From the tone of the speaker’s voice, the way he doesn’t agree with the 10 Fighting Festival in Spain because during the investigation it was explained that most of the festivals hurt bull physically and mentally.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
How the speaker gives a strong and valid argument because the video is based on real investigations and he also persuades his readers not to take part in activities related to the bull festival.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Title : Bullfighting and Tourism
Cohen, Erik. (2014). Bullfighting and Tourism. Tourism Analysis. 19. 10.3727/108354214X14116690097738
How the article contributes to the project :
Most of this article presents the relationship between bullfighting and tourism in Spain. But in this article, it is also presented that sulfate is a hereditary tradition that has become the identity of the Spanish where this tradition attracts a lot of tourists in Spain. But there are also many oppositions to it by animal rights activists and a lot of criticism was present because they considered this condition uncivilized. This has an impact on tourism in the future if there will be more animal activists who are against this festival then in the future, this heritage will fade and be lost in this includes the artistic architectural heritage and material culture of Spain.
Honestly, it’s hard to find an article that is about animals at the bull festival when I found this article and saw that this article alluded to the rights of bulls in the festival I used this article the difference in this article is actually Neutral because but maybe more biased towards tourism as the title says and in the video, it is explained that the speaker is very against the bull festival.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video is discussed about the existence of sexual violence that occurs against animals on a farm where the animals that are the object of sexual violence are pigs and chickens.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
The main purpose of the speaker the bull is to provide information that there is sexual violence on the farm
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
How trustworthy is this video?
This video can be trusted because it was uploaded by a narrator from the PETA which is the largest animal rights organization in the world.
Who is the speaker?
In this video documentation there is an investigator, a supervisor and a worker on the farm
What is the source?
Investigation in a pig and bird farms.
Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think the speaker and the video can be trusted because it was uploaded by the biggest organization on animal rights but I’m a little doubtful whether the video is real or not because from my point of view the video is too exaggerated or too over-investigating something.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
During the investigation, the investigator only asked questions without giving bias, but in the video there was also an article asking the audience not to have sexual abused on animals.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
The speaker did not present an argument with such strong reasons. But because this is a real investigation so I think the argument is quite strong.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Tittle : Animal Sexual Abuse
Helen M.C. Munro (2006). Animal sexual abuse: A veterinary taboo?. , 172(2), 195–197. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.08.033
How the article contribute the project :
This article supports videos because in this article it is also presented that sexual behavior towards animals is a behavior that has existed for a long time or a disease called rupiah where humans tend to be more attracted to animals than humans and this behavior can involve all types of animals, both mammals. or Aves and the author also said that this behavior is not good for animals because it can injure animals in private areas.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video shows that animals such as cats and dogs are used as experimental objects in a laboratory called Liberty. This laboratory research has various clients from the government, then there are also veterinarians and also several universities. In this laboratory, dogs and cats are hurt by repeatedly injecting insecticide into their bodies without anesthesia and then they are also punched in the skull.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
The aim of the writer is to inform about the existence of violence or animal testing in the Liberty reserve laboratory and at the end of the video the speaker asks the audience to stop animal testing.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
3. How trustworthy is this video?
This video can be trusted because it was uploaded by a narrator from the PETA which is the largest animal rights organization in the world.
Who is the speaker?
In this video documentation there is an investigato and a supervisor at the laboratory of Liberty Research.
What is the source?
This video is sourced from documentation and interviews with supervisors at Liberty Research.
Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think because this is a real investigation and documentation by visiting a place that does animal testing this source is very trustworthy and I feel that what is presented in this video is real and without fabrication.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
Throughout the video the speaker presents the negative effects of animal testing on animals that occur in research laboratories, especially for cats and dogs, the speaker does not mention the positive things from the experiment at a minimum, therefore it can be concluded that the speaker is against what he is investigating.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
I think the speaker’s argument is quite convincing because it comes from real investigations and there are also several interview sessions in this video that strengthen the speaker’s argument
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Tittle : Animal Testing and Medicine
Hajar, R. (2011). Animal Testing and Medicine. Heart Views, 12(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705x.81548
How the article contribute the project :
The article that I found in my opinion has two points of view. The first point of view is that nowadays there are many animal rights activists who oppose the existence of experiments on animals because they believe that animals are the same as humans but on the other hand for people who use them. the animals in the experiment thought that the animal could help in the process of finding a cure for a disease, I think this article can help support the video If you look at it from the first point of view.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video is about a global journey about animals that will be skinned and meat was taken this video focuses on traveling from country to country rather than on real investigations when animals are benefited.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
to tell or inform how livestock travels from their country of origin to several countries for their meat and skins.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
3. How trustworthy is this video?
I think this video is enough to be trusted because it presents a real investigation but there is no specific source about where the video was obtained.
Who is the speaker?
the speaker of the video is a member of the PETA community
What is the source?
the source of this video is some video clips about animal travel from country to country.
Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think for the speaker it can be trusted but for the video, it has been good to show several videos with different background settings but it would be better if given the source of the video even though the video is from the PETA’s personal documentation.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
The speaker did not agree with the difficulty of traveling from Brazil to Iraq and then to several countries in Europe where this stresses the animal while traveling for example when an animal is lowered from a ship to a bus or the animal is lifted using a lifting machine and only one leg is lifted and the speaker said that it was not good because it would cause fractures in the leg of the animal’s leg.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
Honestly, this video is a good video for me because there are not many videos that explain the process of how the distribution of these animals is to be used as a benefit for humans from transoceanic and transcontinental travel, but it is better for the speaker to give some strong arguments that have not been presented in this video.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Tittle : Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger Ban the Use of Exotic Animal Leather
https://thebeet.com/calvin-klein-and-tommy-hilfiger-ban-the-use-of-exotic-animal-leather/
How the article contributes the project :
This article is still related to videos because this article also mentions PETA and the video was also uploaded by PETA. In this article, it is mentioned that well-known brands such as Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger have banned the use of animal skins in their products after we sent various petitions to them.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video contains information about an investigation carried out on a zoo in Germany by a map of Germany where baby elephants were violently tortured in order to entertain zoo visitors.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
To inform behind the scenes at the Zoo When animals, especially elephants, practice tricks to entertain visitors and also to persuade the audience not to visit zoos and circuses where there is violence against animals.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
3. How trustworthy is this video?
investigative videos like this can be trusted but maybe from the map they are still keeping the company’s place name code of ethics a secret from the animal
Who is the speaker?
the speaker of the video is a member of the PETA2 community
What is the source?
From investigations
Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think this is believable meaning the investigative video is a real thing.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
The conversation doesn’t agree with the existence of animal torture for entertainment purposes because everything he said is information and persuasion so that we don’t visit the zoo.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
I think this investigation is good but there should be data to support each speaker’s argument that has not been presented in this video.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Tittle : Wild Animals and Justice: The Case of the Dead Elephant in the Room
Helen Kopnina (2016) Wild Animals and Justice: The Case of the Dead Elephant in the Room, Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 19:3, 219-235, DOI: 10.1080/13880292.2016.1204882
How the article contribute the project :
This article supports the video because this article discusses the case of the death of an elephant’s tail and the author also explains that in this world there are seven billion people who enjoy the freedom and there are less than one million elephants who enjoy the freedom and this is not balanced because of this. jeopardizes the ability for humans to empathize and be compassionate towards animals
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video tells about some 16 chimpanzees used for the purpose of making films or making cards of which one of them is named Kanner and he is a smiling chimpanzee in an Alfamart card his smile does not reflect that he is happy but reflects that he is afraid and stressed by coercion from other people. industry insiders besides that there are some chimpanzees that are deliberately put in cages to give birth to children and then the children are sold there are so many sad things that have happened to the 16 inverse for the purpose of entertainment by humans.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
The aim is to inform that there are some chimpanzees that are intentionally used as objects of entertainment for humans and at the end of the video talk also explains that we must support the release of the 16 chimpanzees into their natural habitat.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
3. How trustworthy is this video?
I think it’s like a map investigation video in general, this video can be trusted because it goes through investigation and documentation.
Who is the speaker?
the speaker of the video is a member of the PETA2 community
What is the source?
From investigations and documentations
Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think this is believable meaning the investigative video is a real thing.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
the speaker disagreed with the use of animals in the film industry and the greeting card industry where he supported that chimpanzees in cages should return to their habitat, meaning.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
this video is good but there are some less strong arguments like it is said that one of the baby chimpanzees is assumed to be taken by the map and left to live freely in nature but that is just an assumption and there is no data to support that.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
Title: More Than Sidekicks: Hollywood Must Ban Live Primates in Film (Guest Column)
https://variety.com/2021/film/news/hollywood-monkeys-ban-1234943232/
How the article contributes the project :
the reason why this article supports video is that it explains that primates get bad exploitation behind the scenes and primates should live and live in their natural world, not as movie stars