What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video is informed us about PDA. Is it good or bad to show signs of affection in public and what signs of affections are public appropriate. By the video, I got some information, some of them are:
-For sure nobody feels unconmfortable when a couple kissing or holy hands.
-Whatever it is the desire to displays public displays of affection, it’s going to depending on individual’s experience (culture, religion).
-Person has experience relationship before will likely influence their ideas of PDA.
-So, PDA is not inherently good or bad. it’s up to the preference of the both individual in the relationship.
-In many areas of the world, PDA are not only appropriate but they are admired.
-Just doing testeful and not doing anything super inappropriate that would be offensive to the general public, just be tasteful in front of kids.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
The speaker’s main purpose is to tell us and to share the idea about what Public Display of Affection is good or bad
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think this video is trustworthy enough. The speaker claim himself as a Relationship Specialist. From iDateAdvice youtube channel. I think the speaker and the source is trustworthy enough, because I have watched some videos of youtube cannel, and I found that the content of this channel just discuss about relationship.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
The speaker is uses relaxed tone. He seems agree with PDA as long as the couple understand and apply the boundaries that exist in society.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
He conveys this by relating it to what is happening in society
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
The topics in this video help as an opening for my larger projects, as they provide basic information
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video is about a man named Iain myles from who interviews by asking the ladies that he meets on the street whether their like public displays of affection. And some information that I have got are:
– Some people like PDA, some others don’t like it, and there are some people who are half about it, it depends on how intense is.
-kissing and hugging may be okay.
-it can be annoying, but it is personal business.
-small kiss would be fine
-there are people who personally don’t like to do PDA to itself because they thought that some things are just supposed to stay private.
-some people thought that PDA is okay and people can do whatever they like as long as not obnoxious.
-many people wouldn’t stop the couple that doing too much PDA, maybe telling them that is just uncomfortable.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
The speaker’s main purpose is to collect information about how woman’s perspectives about do they like to show affection in public and their perspectives about drawing the line in affection in public.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
Ii think this video is trustworthy. The speaker is Iain Myles, an executive dating coach of Kamalifestyles. He specializes in coaching men who have been looking for dating success and chronically unlucky with women. He publishes regular infield dating videos, street interviews and social experiments in KamaTV. He’s highly experienced in live training of our clients on streets, coffee shops, in bars and clubs. Iain teaches the core principles of the approach that every guy needs to know to become successful in dating including confidence, conversational skills, connection and mind sets. The source is directly from sources in the field. I think the source and the speaker are trustworthy.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
The attitude of the speakers (in this case the womens) was very kind and open about the topic. Some of them approve or enjoy public displays of affection, and others enjoy displaying it with some line in affection. The tone of the speaker on the subject was the relaxed tone.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
The speaker supports their key points by relating it to their personal.experience/
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
This can be helpful to add information about PDA from woman’s perspective and became a trigger for me to dig deeper information about PDA.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
the video discuss about there is PDA is allowed in Islam or not. and I got some information about from the video. there are:
• When Moslem married couple sitting really close together, holding hand, and show his/her affection in public, if they want to do these activities, just get a room. It is just like why you should do that in public?
• PDA is unheard of in Islam.
• Islam face these activities are not as showing affection, but just wanting to get people attention and impress people with their relationship.
• Moslem can be better manner than to show the relationship in public. Because it is not for the sake of Allah and nor a great way to show spouse love each other.
• this is not a part of the etiquettes and the modesty of Muslims to show such affection in public
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
the speaker actually just answer a question that thas chosen by the crew from the audience. And the speaker explain to the audience and educate the audience that PDA is not part of the ethics and modesty of a Muslim.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think this video is trustworthy. the speaker is Sheikh assim alhakeem. He is an Islamic scholar living in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and a prodigious propagator of Islamic material in English on the Internet. About the source, it must be from his knowledge that he have from learn depth about Islam. I think the source and the speaker are trustworthy.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
he disagrees with it because he know that it was’nt part of the behavior that a Muslim should have
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
he talks based on his knowledge, and his knowledge based on the role that exist in religion.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
this video help to add information about PDAs from a religion perspective, in this video from a Muslim perspective.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
most of language in the video using Thai, so I skipped to minute 07.22 and I start to collect the information. some information that I get are:
• people have different perspective about what can do and can not do in Public Display of Affection (PDA)
• holding hand is normal to show
• anything more than hug just like kissing
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
Speaker main purpose in the video is to collect information about what Thai people think about PDA by doing QnA in Thai streetwith Thai people as the target.
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think it can be trustworthy, because the person being asked is not just one, it is from various thoughts which they answer based on what they feel.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
the speaker/questioner is just neutral about PDA when he is asking the citizen. And the speaker stays neutral until the end.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
He is just neutral.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
this video help me to know PDA from Thai perspective. Which we know that Thailand is still part of ASIA, and how it face PDA.
What is being discussed in the video? Explain your answer.
The video is about a couple doing prank to their friends. The prank is doing super overly PDA in front of their friend to see their reaction. The prank starts when they are playing a game.
– At the beginning of the prank, their friends try to ignore and focus on the game, but with time the situation is awkward.
– Their friends thought that what they are doing is a little bit weird.
– They thought that too much PDA was weird.
– Their friend feels uncomfortable by what the pranker’s doing.
What is the speaker’s main purpose? Explain your answer.
the speaker or here the Youtuber’s main purpose is to see the reaction of their friends
How trustworthy is this video? Who is the speaker? What is the source? Do you think the source and the speaker are trustworthy?
I think this video can be trustworthy because the reaction of their friend looks natural. even so, there is still possible that the video is untrustworthy because much content on youtube can be set.
What the speaker’s attitude or tone towards the subject? Does he/she seem to agree or disagree with it? Explain your answer.
reaction of their friend is like they are didn’t feel comfort with that situation, but they didn’t want to tell them.
Does the speaker put forward valid or strong arguments? How does he/she support the key points? Explain your answer.
no.
Explain how this article will help contribute to your larger group project.
this is the last video that I saw to complete my project, so this video help me to complete the information that I collect from the previous videos from friends’ points of view.